Jorma Jyrkkanen's Archival Posts : February 2023

Sunday, February 26, 2023

Lab Leak Theory Upheld by Researchers Findings. Impossible to be An Accident-Researcher. 2023-02-26.Jorma A Jyrkkanen BSc, PDP

Introduction

There is new cutting-edge research into the origins of SARS-CoV-2, replicated by Dr. Francis Balloux, strongly supports the laboratory origins theory. Princeton researcher Alex Washburne in October 2022 announced the pre-print publication of the study, which some skeptics are now crediting with changing their mind on the issue. “We examined whether SARS-CoV-2 was synthesized in a lab,” Washburne wrote. “We studied a common method for synthesizing CoVs in the lab. This method was thought to not leave a fingerprint. We found the fingerprint. That fingerprint is in the SARS-CoV-2 genome.” Professor Francois Balloux, a world renowned expert on Covid-19, gave his assessment of the study. Professor Balloux said that he could replicate its key findings. “This is an important piece of work,” Balloux said. “To me, it looks solid both conceptually and methodologically. I was given advance warning and was able to replicate the key findings. To the best of my knowledge, I confirm the reported patterns are genuine.” Dr. Anthony Fauci and other top scientists are expected to be called before the new GOP-led House of Representatives to account for misleading the public on Covid-19. These newly unredacted NIH emails will provide more ammunition for critics of the U.S. government’s Covid-19 pandemic response.

The Research Supporting a Lab Leak TY - BOOK AU - Banoun, Helene PY - 2022/04/05 SP - N2 - The non-natural origin of SARS-CoV-2 has been raised and discussed for the past 2 years. It is important to discuss it to understand the inflection of biopolitics since the 2000s. In addition, structural features of the virus, new compared to other known coronaviruses, may explain some aspects of the Covid-19 clinic and therapy. SARS-CoV-2 is the only one among human pathogenic coronaviruses to possess both a furin polybasic cleavage site and a human ACE2 binding site that explain its ability to infect humans and its pathogenicity. The main argument against the natural origin of the virus is that no animals acting as intermediate hosts could be identified and no close virus from which it could have evolved naturally was found. In favor of an "artificial" or "synthetic" origin are (among other arguments) past experiments with furin site insertion and human ACE2 binding site insertion, as well as projects revealed by recently declassified documents. SARS-CoV-2 also possesses the ability to bind to other receptors that some gain-of-function experiments might have sought to optimize. These gain-of-function (GoF) experiments are described in great detail in EcoHealth Alliance's response to a DARPA request for proposals. GoFs on coronaviruses began to be funded by the NIH in the early 2000s and involved the Wuhan Laboratory (WIV) thereafter. The European Commission also funds the WIV with the Horizon 2020 project (EVAg and EVA Global). An investigation is underway in the U.S. Senate and senators have stated that a laboratory leak is the most likely option and have referred to the GoFs conducted by the NIH in Wuhan despite the moratorium that would have been circumvented. T1 - The origin of the Covid-19 virus : update April 2022 Jorma Jyrkkanen

A large number of Wuhan Chinese visited Bali post outbreak

Accidental Leak Impossible to Cause Pandemic According to Researcher Assuption Ergo Deliberate, then Who Did It

Visit https://twitter.com/i/status/1630393478483161089 'Impossible to be an accident' ergo a crime. But was the leak from a Wuhan lab or Military Games participants? The Chinese Military Games Were Held at an Ideal Time for a Pandemic Innoculation. American Athletes were present and suspiciusly coronavirus pandemic exercises were held in America at that time also. During the COVID-19 pandemic, conspiracy theories emerged in China that the SARS-CoV-2 virus originated in the United States and was brought to China by an American participant in the Military World Games. One version of the conspiracy theory states that the virus was created by the CIA. A Chinese government official supported and helped spread one of the conspiracy theories. Athletes Élodie Clouvel and Matteo Tagliariol each stated they developed a severe illness around the time they attended the games, but there is no evidence that they transmitted these illnesses – neither at the games nor upon returning to their units. A U.S. Army athlete who attended the games was accused of being "patient zero" of the novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, and was harassed on social media, despite never having symptoms or testing positive. A coronavirus public health exercise in the United States called Event 201 was held at the same time as the games, and this is sometimes cited by conspiracy theorists as further evidence of misconduct. Did Trump order the release via Fauci with American Lab help.

Who Started the War in Ukraine. Is Zelenski actualy Protecting Ukraine or Threatening it with Major War. 2023-02-26. Jorma A Jyrkkanen, BSc, PDP

Berlusconi said Ukraine started the war by attacking Donbass, the Russian Speaking part of Ukraine. Stone mentioned this same thing.

THE MINSK AGREEMENT https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/UA_150212_MinskAgreement_en.pdf Package of measures for the Implementation of the Minsk agreements 1. Immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Ukraine and its strict implementation starting from 00.00 AM (Kiev time) on the 15th of February, 2015. 2. Withdrawal of heavy weapons by both sides on equal distances in order to create a security zone at least 50 km wide from each other for the artillery systems with caliber greater than 100mm and more, a security zone of 70 km wide for MLRS and 140 km wide for MLRS “Tornado-C”, “Uragan”, “Smerch” and Tactical missile systems “Tochka” (“Tochka U”): - for the Ukrainian troops: from the de facto line of contact; - for the armed formations from certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk oblast of Ukraine from the line of contact according to the Minsk memorandum of September 19, 2014. The withdrawal of the heavy weapons as specified above is to start on day 2 of the ceasefire at the latest and to be completed within 14 days. The process shall be facilitated by the OSCE and supported by the Trilateral Contact Group. 3. Ensure effective monitoring and verification of the ceasefire regime and the withdrawal of heavy weapons by the OSCE from the day 1 of the withdrawal, using all technical equipment necessary, including satellites, drones, radar equipment, etc. 4. Launch a dialogue, on day 1 of the withdrawal on modalities of local elections in accordance with Ukrainian legislation and the Law of Ukraine “On interim local self-government order in certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions” as well as on the future regime of these areas based on this Law. Adopt promptly, by no later than 30 days after the date of signing of the document a resolution of the Parliament of Ukraine specifying the area enjoying the special regime, under the Law of Ukraine On interim local self-government order in certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions”, based on the line of the Minsk Memorandum of September 19, 2014. 5. Ensure pardon and amnesty by enacting the law prohibiting the prosecution and punishment of persons in connection with the events that took place in certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Ukraine. 6. Ensure release and exchange of all hostages and unlawfully detained persons, based on the principle “all for all”. This process is to be finished on the day 5 after the withdrawal at the latest. 7. Ensure safe access, delivery, storage, and distribution of humanitarian assistance to those in need, on the basis of an international mechanism. 8. Definition of modalities of full resumption of socio-economic ties, including social transfers, such as pension, payments and other payments (incomes and revenues, timely payments of all utility bills, reinstating taxation within the legal framework of Ukraine). To this end, Ukraine shall reinstate control of the segment of its banking system in the conflict- affected areas and possibly an international mechanism to facilitate such transfers shall be established. 9. Reinstatement of full control of the state border by the government of Ukraine throughout the conflict area, starting on day 1 after the local elections and ending after the comprehensive political settlement (local elections in certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions on the basis of the Law of Ukraine and constitutional reform) to be finalized by the end of 2015, provided that paragraph 11 has been implemented in consultation with and upon agreement by representatives of certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in the framework of the Trilateral Contact Group. 10. Withdrawal of all foreign armed formations, military equipment, as well as mercenaries from the territory of Ukraine under monitoring of the OSCE. Disarmament of all illegal groups. 11. Carrying out constitutional reform in Ukraine with a new Constitution entering into force by the end of 2015, providing for decentralization as a key element (including a reference to the specificities of certain areas in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions, agreed with the representatives of these areas), as well as adopting permanent legislation on the special status of certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in line with measures as set out in the footnote until the end of 2015i. 12. Based on the Law of Ukraine “On interim local self-government order in certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions”, questions related to local elections will be discussed and agreed upon with representatives of certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in the framework of the Trilateral Contact Group. Elections will be held in accordance with relevant OSCE standards and monitored by OSCE/ODIHR. 13. Intensify the work of the Trilateral Contact Group including through the establishment of working groups on the implementation of relevant aspects of the Minsk agreements. They will reflect the composition of the Trilateral Contact Group. Participants of the Trilateral Contact Group: Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini Second President of Ukraine, L.D. Kuchma Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Ukraine, M.Y. Zurabov A.V. Zakharchenko I.V. Plotnitskiy Minsk, 12 February 2015 i Such measures are, according to the Law on the special order for local self-government in certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions: - Exemption from punishment, prosecution and discrimination for persons involved in the events that have taken place in certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions; - Right to linguistic self-determination; - Participation of organs of local self-government in the appointment of heads of public prosecution offices and courts in certain areas pf the Donetsk and Lugansk regions; - Possibility for certain governmental authorities to initiate agreements with organs of local self- government regarding the economic, social and cultural development of certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions; - State supports the social and economic development of certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions; - Support by central government authorities of cross-border cooperation in certain areas of Donetsk and Lugansk regions with districts of the Russian Federation; - Creation of the people’s police units by decision of local councils for the maintenance of public order in certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions; The powers of deputies of local councils and officials, elected at early elections, appointed by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine by the law, cannot be early terminated AGREEMENT WITH GORBACHEV ON BRINGING DOWN THE BERLIN WALL AND POULLING BACK THE SOVIET ARMY https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2017-12-12/nato-expansion-what-gorbachev-heard-western-leaders-early

https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2017-12-12/nato-expansion-what-gorbachev-heard-western-leaders-early What actually happened?

Overthrow of Viktor Yanukovych PRO RUSSIAN ELECTED PRESIDENT From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Overthrow of Viktor Yanukovych may refer to: 2014 Ukrainian revolution, where president Viktor Yanukovych was ousted Orange Revolution of 2004–2005, where president-elect Viktor Yanukovych's electoral victory was nullified DID THE CIA AND OR BIDENS PARTICIPATE IN THIS OVERTHROW AMERICAN PARTICIPATION IN OTHER REGIME CHANGES SUGGESTS A ROLE

THEN PENTAGON POSTS THIS September 18, 2015, 1:26 PM

WHO STARTED THE WARS IN THE MIDDLE EAST-> WOULD THEY DO NASTY THINGS TO RUSSIA?

NOAM CHOMSKY OPINION Noam Chomsky explains how US involvement in Ukraine and the expansion of NATO to Russia's border created the War in Ukraine: "The idea that Ukraine would join a western military alliance would be quite unacceptable to any Russian leader. Gorbachev agreed to allow Germany to join NATO with a quid pro quo that NATO would not expand one inch to the east. NATO instantly moved to east Germany. Then Clinton came along and expanded NATO right to the borders of Russia." REPORTER: You can understand why Ukraine's president would see joining NATO as protecting his country? "No, it's not. Crimea was taken away after the overthrow of the government, right? He's not protecting Ukraine; he's threatening Ukraine with a major war. This is a strategic threat to Russia which any Russian leader would have to react to."

DELIBERATION OF THESE GEOPOLITICAL EVENTS WOULD LEAD ONE TO THE CONCLUSION THAT A WAR IS COMING LIKE IT OR NOT SO PERHAPS ITS WISE TO TAKE THE INITIATIVE AND SET THE SCENE SO ITS NOT A SURPRISE. Putin once asked to join NATO. He was turned down. It would appear NATO had other plans for him including sanctions and a freeze on SWIFT banking.

Friday, February 24, 2023

Trudeau His Police State and Lies. Photos Speak Volumes about His Style and Covert Allegiance to WEF Totalitarianism. 2023-02-24. Capt. Jorma A Jyrkkanen BSc, PDP, RWR, Pfc-1st Class

This is me Captain of my own Vessel.

TRUDEAU. SELECTED BY KLAUS SCHWAB TO LEAD THE GREAT RESET. TAKING THE HAND SHAKE TO SEAL THE DEAL. IS THIS NOT SUBVERSION AND TREASON?

PLEDGING LOYALTY TO AN UNELECTED BODY FOR A MISSION, THE GREAT RESET IS NOT WHAT WE GAVE HIM THE HONOUR OF BEING OUR PM FOR. WE CHOSE HIM TO UPHOLD THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION AND OUR CHARTER RIGHTS. BY DECLARING OUR CHARTER NULL AND VOID AT THE TRUCKERS PROTEST AND IMPLEMENTING BANK FREEZES AND ARRESTS AND SIEZURES, HE IMPLMENTED TOTALITARIAN CONTROL, A POLICE STATE. HE SHOWED THAT HIS LOYALTY TO KLAUS SCHWAB OVER-RODE HIS DUTY TO CANADA AND SHOULD BE TURFED FOR TREASON.