THE MURDER OF SECRETARY GENERAL DAG HAMMARSKJOLD AND THE PERPS BEHIND IT. 2023-04-25. EDITOR, ANALYST JORMA JYRKKANEN

https://jyrkkanenepigeneticsnews.wordpress.com/2023/04/25/dag-hammarskjolds-death/ We Deliberately Spread AIDS in Africa [for Population Control]. Apartheid Intelligence Officer Confession. Story Baffour Ankomah 2023-04-24/ Analyst Jorma Jyrkkanen Reviewer Dag Hammarskjolds Death What Really Happened to Dag Hammarskjold’s Plane More than 60 years after the deaths of the U.N. chief and his team, the victims’ families believe the answer may lie in Washington’s and London’s archives. February 15, 2022, 11:25 AM PARTIES INVCOLVED IN THE PLOT.

THE SCENE OF THE CRASH AFTER BOMB IN WHEELWELL PLANTED BY SAIMR MERCENARIES FAIILED TO EXPLODE BUT THE PLANE WAS SHOT DOWN NEAR NDOLA AIRPORT RHODESIA

DAGS BODY WITH ACE OF SPADES CARD IN COLLAR, CALLING CARD OF THE CIA

THE RAF PILOT WORKING AS A BELIAN MERCENARY ACTING ON ORDERS FROM UK AND CIA INTELLIGENCE

By Colum Lynch The wreckage of Dag Hammarskjold’s plane The wreckage of Dag Hammarskjold’s plane The wreckage of Dag Hammarskjold’s plane, which mysteriously crashed near the town of Ndola in Northern Rhodesia, now Zambia, in 1961. AFP via Getty Images Last September, U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres marked the 60th anniversary of the death of his predecessor Dag Hammarskjold, who was killed in a mysterious plane crash in Northern Rhodesia, now Zambia, on Sept. 18, 1961, by laying a wreath alongside the names of other fallen U.N. staffers. But in his tribute—which hailed the late Swedish diplomat as a “noble servant of peace”—Guterres neglected to mention any of the 15 other U.N. advisors, bodyguards, and crew members who also perished aboard Hammarskjold’s Douglas DC-6 airliner, named the Albertina, or later due to their injuries. The omission rankled many descendants of the crash victims, who took it as the latest sign that the United Nations has been conducting a listless investigation into one of diplomacy’s most extraordinary cold cases of the 20th century. But the inquiries—which examined new evidence suggesting that Hammarskjold’s plane may have been targeted for attack—have been ultimately stymied by the refusal of powers such as the United States, Britain, and South Africa to fully open their intelligence archives from the period to U.N. investigators. Dags Body Head Shot, THE CARD IN HIS COLLAR WAS AN ACE OF SPADES THE CALLING CARD OF THE CIA “It did not go unnoticed that in your comments marking the 60th anniversary of the crash you paid tribute to former Secretary General Dag Hammarskjöld without making any mention of those accompanying him,” Hynrich Wieschhoff wrote to the U.N. chief last December, in a letter that was signed by more than 100 other relatives of the victims. “They too were United Nations civil servants or working on behalf of the United Nations. And, they too lost their lives in service to the United Nations.” Fingered for Shooting Down Dags Plane After Bomb Planted in Wheel Well by SAIMR MERCENARY Operatives failed to Detonate on Takeoff On Orders from UK and CIA Bosses. RAF Pilot Jan Van Risseghem acting as Belgian Mercenary. “Disappointed as we are, we are not surprised,” added Wieschhoff, whose father, Heinrich Wieschhoff, was an anthropologist who served as one of Hammarskjold’s political advisors. “As we perceive it, your failure to honor the service and sacrifice of our loved ones is consistent with the indifference that the United Nations has shown to uncovering the truth about the cause of the crash.” The vast majority of the descendants of the victims of the crash believe that the plane was brought down by foul play, most likely attacked by a European mercenary group employed by a Belgian mining company in support of a secessionist rebellion in the mineral-rich Congolese state of Katanga, according to two family members. Hammarskjold was on his way to mediate an end to the secession and civil war in the breakaway state when he was killed in the crash. They fear they are running out of time to get to the bottom of what happened. Key witnesses from the time period are dying off, and the U.N. inquiry, led by former Tanzanian Chief Justice Mohamed Chande Othman, is set to conclude in September without having established conclusively the circumstances of how the plane crashed. Othman has been investigating the case on and off for the U.N. since March 2015. Sven Goran Hallonquist was 10 when his father, Per Hallonquist, piloted Hammarskjold’s plane on its final flight. Through most of his life, he said, he has been unable to say with certainty whether the crash that killed his father was an accident or if the plane was brought down by hostile forces. That all changed about six or seven years ago, when the son of the plane owner’s chief engineer provided him with a copy of the original Rhodesian technical report, which indicated that the plane made an erratic maneuver shortly before it crashed, suggesting it was evading a potential threat. “I think that is the most probable thing—that it was shot down by another plane,” Hallonquist said, noting that the vast majority of victims’ families believe so, too. Hallonquist said he and other relatives of the victims want the U.N. to pursue the case more vigorously and the U.N. chief to take a more personal role in seeing the case through. “We think we need to put pressure on him to try to pressure the United States and Britain and South Africa for more resources to search their archives,” he said. Read More U.N. to Probe Whether Iconic Secretary-General Was Assassinated Newly­ discovered documents revive claim that Dag Hammarskjold may have been killed by South African agents backed by the CIA. Exclusive | Colum Lynch How Race Hampered the Investigation Into Dag Hammarskjold’s Death Testimony of African eyewitnesses to the U.N. secretary-general’s death was dismissed because of their lack of education and perceived susceptibility to political manipulation. Document | Colum Lynch Liberty, Equality, Police Brutality French cops have gotten more heavy-handed than anywhere else in Europe. Report | Michele Barbero Over the years, Othman has amassed a “significant amount of evidence,” including the testimony of African eyewitnesses suggesting foul play was largely ignored by early investigations in the 1960s. That goes against claims by British colonial authorities in Northern Rhodesia at the time that Hammarskjold’s death was an accident. Othman has explored a theory that a mysterious aircraft may have either fired on Hammarskjold’s plane or harassed the pilot, causing it to crash, or even that the plane may have been sabotaged by South African mercenaries, allegedly with the aid of the CIA and other Western intelligence agencies. The CIA has previously denied involvement in the alleged Operation Celeste. Othman said in his two previous reports, issued in 2017 and 2019, that the “burden of proof” was on member states to demonstrate that they have conducted a thorough review of their records and archives, particularly from their intelligence agencies. “[T]he continued non-disclosure of potentially relevant new information in the intelligence, security and defence archives of Member States constitutes the biggest barrier to understanding the full truth on the event,” Othman wrote in his 2017 report. The governments of Zimbabwe, Zambia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo have appointed high-ranking figures, including Sydney Sekeramayi, a former Zimbabwean defense minister, to oversee the search for documents and have provided full access to their archives. Belgium, France, and Sweden have also granted extensive access to their security files. But the United States and Britain have been less forthcoming, appointing relatively low-level officials to manage the search for relevant evidence and releasing the occasional confirmation of evidence brought to them by the U.N. Two men lay a wreath on the monument marking the site where Hammarskjold and fifteen others died in a plane crash near Ndola in Northern Rhodesia in September 1963. Two men lay a wreath on the monument marking the site where Hammarskjold and fifteen others died in a plane crash near Ndola in Northern Rhodesia in September 1963. Two men lay a wreath on the monument marking the site where Hammarskjold and 14 others died in a plane crash near Ndola in September 1963. The only person to survive the crash, security officer Harold Julien, died nearly a week later from his injuries. Daily Express, Hulton Archive/Getty Images The air tragedy unfolded against the background of a bloody civil war that followed Congo’s independence from Belgium. The war pitted Congolese nationalists against a secessionist rebellion in the mineral-rich state of Katanga, which had the backing of Belgium, Western mining companies, European mercenaries, and the CIA. Hammarskjold was en route to Ndola in Northern Rhodesia to negotiate a cease-fire with secessionist leader Moise Tshombe. The United Nations sent peacekeepers into Congo, where they ultimately found themselves at war with Katangan separatists and European mercenaries, who were backed by Western mining interests. A Rhodesian commission of inquiry found that the pilot had miscalculated the height of the tree line and plowed into the forest canopy. A subsequent U.N. inquiry could not establish the cause of the crash, leaving open the possibility that Hammarskjold could have died either as a result of an accident or foul play. Eyewitnesses in the area recall seeing a small plane approach the Albertina before there was a bright flash in the sky and then watching the flaming aircraft plunge into the forest, instantly killing everyone on board except the delegation’s acting chief security officer, Harold Julien, who died from his injuries nearly a week later. Before his death, Julien, a former U.S. Marine, “suggested a threat or attack as the plane approached Ndola, possibly involving a sudden explosion,” according to Othman’s reports. “This evidence was augmented in 2018/19 by information from Zimbabwe that showed that Northern Rhodesian authorities had tried to stifle those statements of Julien from being made public,” Othman wrote in his 2019 report. Othman has cited documents indicating that British officials had intervened behind closed doors to persuade the U.N. to alter the conclusions of the report to rule sabotage or an external attack. The case remained unsolved for decades, fueling conspiracy theories and inspiring generations of journalists, scholars, and other researchers. In 1992, two of Hammarskjold’s top advisors, Conor Cruise O’Brien and George Ivan Smith, wrote in the Guardian that they had evidence that their boss’s plane had been shot down by accident by mercenaries in the employ of Belgian, American, and British mining interests, which feared Hammarskjold’s peacemaking would jeopardize their business interests. Goran Bjorkdahl, a Swedish national whose father worked in the region, began researching the U.N. chief’s death and conducting interviews with local charcoal-makers who had witnessed the Albertina’s final descent. Rhodesian and U.N. investigators at the time largely dismissed the testimony of local Black African eyewitnesses. The case received a boost when Susan Williams, a British scholar who grew up in Zambia, revisited the crime, unearthing previously unseen documents from the archived papers of Lord Cuthbert Alport—who was the British high commissioner to Rhodesia in 1961 and who was at the Ndola airport on the night of the crash—including a secret report by Neil Ritchie, an MI6 agent who organized the planned meeting between Hammarskjold and Tshombe. Williams’s 2011 book, Who Killed Hammarskjöld? The UN, the Cold War and White Supremacy in Africa, helped spur the establishment a year later of the Hammarskjold Commission, a voluntary body of international jurists and lawyers chaired by a British judge, Stephen Sedley. Williams has since fed documents to the U.N. investigators. “The responses of the U.S. and the U.K. to Judge Othman have been appalling and arrogant,” Williams told Foreign Policy in an email. “But they are entirely consistent with the behavior of those states at the time of the crash, when Britain was the colonial and racist ruler of Northern Rhodesia (Zambia) and the U.S. was interfering in the process of decolonization in Africa.” “Both the U.K. and the U.S. stated that all relevant information had already been made available,” she added. “But this was not true in either case.” The Hammarskjold Commission concluded in its final 2013 report that “[t]here is persuasive evidence that the aircraft was subjected to some form of attack or threat as it circled to land at Ndola.” It also concluded that it “is highly likely that the entirety of the local and regional Ndola radio traffic on the night of 17-­18 September 1961 was tracked and recorded by the NSA [the U.S. National Security Agency], and possibly also by the CIA.” These findings prompted the U.N. General Assembly in 2015 to adopt a resolution calling on then-U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to create a panel of experts to examine the case and determine whether there was enough evidence to merit further investigation. Ban appointed Othman, who is expected to conclude his work in September. Demonstrators with signs saying the USSR is responsible for the crash that killed Hammarskjold in front of the UN building in New York on Sept. 21, 1961. Demonstrators with signs saying the USSR is responsible for the crash that killed Hammarskjold in front of the UN building in New York on Sept. 21, 1961. Demonstrators hold signs claiming the Soviet Union was responsible for the crash that killed Hammarskjold in front of the U.N. headquarters in New York on Sept. 21, 1961. Gamma-Keystone/via Getty Images At the time of Hammarskjold’s death, the United States and Britain had extensive intelligence assets in the region, including CIA agents and NSA surveillance capabilities. But much of what the U.N. has learned about U.S. activities in the region has come from independent researchers, private archives, or other governments. Othman has asked the United States to provide access to intercepts or other evidence of communications from Hammarskjold’s plane or other U.S. aircraft in the area at the time of the crash. On the night of the crash, there were at least three U.S. planes, including U.S. Army and Navy attaches’ aircraft, equipped with state-of-the-art surveillance equipment at the airport in Ndola. One U.S. intelligence official, Charles Southall, recalled in interviews having overheard intercepts of a known European mercenary pilot, nicknamed the “Lone Ranger,” shooting Hammarskjold’s plane. The U.S. ambassador to Congo, Edmund A. Gullion, sent a report to Washington on the day Hammarskjold was killed stating that the plane “may have been shot down.” “The historical record strongly suggests that Governments, including the United States, which had a presence in and around the Congo region at the time, may hold such evidence,” Othman wrote in an annex to his 2019 report. But the United States has provided limited confirmation. For years, Washington denied that Paul Abram—a former U.S. Air Force Security Service officer who also overheard transmissions of an attack the night of the crash—worked for the United States, only acknowledging his links to U.S. intelligence after he furnished American officials with his government identification. A spokesperson for the U.S. State Department said the United States takes Othman’s inquiries “seriously” and “shares his interests in understanding the circumstances of the death of Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjold.” “Over the years, the United States has shared over a thousand pages of previously classified documents [with the U.N. investigator],” the spokesperson said, speaking on condition of anonymity. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the official added, “conducted yet another exhaustive search for U.S. intelligence archives and did not find any additional information that would shed light on the circumstances of Secretary-General Hammarskjold’s death.” British and Rhodesian colonial intelligence officials were also intercepting communications, suggesting they may have pertinent clues buried in their own archives. Othman is seeking access to documents describing the activities of Ritchie, the MI6 agent, and other British officials who were tasked with organizing the meeting between Hammarskjold and Tshombe. Othman also sought information about a Belgian mercenary pilot, Jan Van Risseghem, who had served in the British Royal Air Force during World War II and is alleged by a colleague to have admitted to flying the plane that brought down Hammarskjold’s aircraft. Pierre Coppens, a colleague of the Belgian pilot, asserted in the documentary Cold Case Hammarskjöld that Van Risseghem was known as the Lone Ranger. In response to a request for comment, a spokesperson for the British Foreign Office wrote by email: “The UK Government has conducted a thorough review of all the relevant files held by our Defence, Diplomatic and Intelligence organisations and is confident all relevant information has already been shared with the [U.N.] Inquiry team.” Before his death, Southall, who was an NSA officer based at a listening post in Cyprus in 1961, claimed he had picked up a radio intercept of what he believed was the cockpit transmission of a fighter pilot opening fire on Hammarskjold’s plane. “You could hear the gun cannon firing—rat tat tat. And he said, ‘I’ve hit it,’” Southall recalled in an interview for the same documentary. “‘There are flames coming out of it,’ and quite quickly he said, ‘It’s crashed.’ And that was the end of the recording, and we processed this recording and sent it off to Washington.” Othman is also seeking information from the South African government about an alleged plot by a paramilitary group, known as the South African Institute for Maritime Research, to assassinate Hammarskjold by placing a bomb in his plane before it left the airfield in Leopoldville—now the Congolese capital of Kinshasa—en route to Ndola. In a March 2019 letter to South Africa, Othman said he understood that the South African government had located documents detailing the plan, dubbed Operation Celeste, but that those documents have never been shared with the United Nations. The South African government did not respond in time to Foreign Policy’s request for comment. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres lays a wreath on Hammarskjold’s grave on April 22, 2018.FREDRIK SANDBERG/AFP via Getty Images Wieschhoff and other relatives of the crash victims are hoping that the U.N. will step up pressure on the United States, Britain, and South Africa to open their archives. “The UN’s effort, such as it is, creeps along and now enters its ninth exasperating year,” Wieschhoff wrote in the joint letter to Guterres. “From the outset, the search for answers has, in our view, been underfunded and understaffed.” Othman, he added, took on this formidable investigation “lacking a sufficient mandate and the Secretariat lacking a genuine commitment.” “We also would have thought that by now you would have insisted that each of those governments present you or Chief Justice Othman with an action plan designed to promptly survey its archives and release all records bearing on the crash,” he added. Guterres wrote back to the families: “I fully understand your grievances and will take them seriously into account for the future.” “I wish to confirm to you my personal commitment to pursue the full truth of what happened on that fateful night in 1961,” he wrote. “We owe this to those who perished, and to you, the relatives.” Guterres also said he was “encouraged by the progress” Othman has made over the years and would continue to do everything to help him carry out his work. But he made no pledge to personally press key governments, including the United States and Britain, to release all relevant documents in their archives. Colum Lynch was a staff writer at Foreign Policy between 2010 and 2022. Twitter: @columlynch Share this: TwitterFacebook Related We Deliberately Spread AIDS in Africa [for Population Control]. Apartheid Intelligence Officer Confession. Story Baffour Ankomah 2023-04-24/ Analyst Jorma Jyrkkanen Reviewer April 24, 2023 In "Africa depopulation" Pulp Mills and Cancer Association March 3, 2010 In "British Columbia" BREAKING NEWS: The FDA was involved in the development of Covid-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon at UNCBSL3. The Pentagon bought and paid for the toxic mRNA shots and helped create Covid-19. All are guilty of Nuremberg crimes, murder and conspiracy to commit murder. 2023-04-17. April 17, 2023 In "bioterrorism" Tags: DAG HAMMARSKJOLD, MURDER

THE AIDS PLANDEMIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, AN APARTHEID, UK AND CIA CONTRIVANCE. 2023-04-24. ANALYST JORMA JYRKKANEN

THE ACTORS

Environment Gene Interactions Just another WordPress.com weblog « Crossing the Species Divide with a Little Help. HIV AIDS. 2023-04-18. Researcher Jorma Jyrkkanen Reviews the Science. We Deliberately Spread AIDS in Africa [for Population Control]. Apartheid Intelligence Officer Confession. Story Baffour Ankomah 2023-04-24/ Analyst Jorma Jyrkkanen Reviewer “We deliberately spread AIDS in South Africa” Head of SAIMR, South Africa Institute of Marine Research, a White Covert Supremacist Subversive Guerilla Army “We deliberately spread AIDS in South Africa” Written by Baffour Ankomah PublishedMarch 13, 2019 Share In a shocking confession, made on camera in a new documentary released last month, a former member of South Africa’s Apartheid-era intelligence service says that the Aids virus, and other diseases, were deliberately spread among the population in an effort to kill off as many blacks as possible. His confession, considered just the tip of the iceberg, has reignited the simmering debate about the whole phenomenon of Aids in Africa. Report by Baffour Ankomah. In a shocking confession, made on camera in a new documentary – Cold Case Hammarskjöld – a former member of South Africa’s Apartheid-era intelligence service says that the Aids virus, and other diseases, were deliberately spread among the population in an effort to kill off as many blacks as possible. His confession, considered just the tip of the iceberg, has reignited the simmering debate about the whole phenomenon of Aids in Africa. Until February 2019, most Africans did not know about the Sundance Film Festival, a programme of the Sundance Institute, which takes place annually in Park City, Utah in America. Now they know because something controversial happened at the Festival this year that will live with Africans for a long time to come. Having had 224,900 attendees in 2018, Sundance is the largest independent film festival in the US. This year it took place between 24 January and 3 February – the attendance figure is not yet out. What is out is controversy – a damning confession by a former Apartheid-era operative who admitted on camera, in one of the films shown, that he and his colleagues at the South African Institute for Maritime Research (SAIMR), which masterminded coups and other forms of violence across Africa in the 1970s and 80s, deliberately spread the HIV virus in the Southern African region to wipe out black people. Alexander Jones, who says he “spent years as an intelligence officer” with SAIMR 30 years ago, became the centre of attraction on the third day of the Sundance Festival when the Danish/Swedish-made documentary, Cold Case Hammarskjöld, was screened. Sources in South Africa say SAIMR was linked to the country’s notorious chemical and biological warfare (CBW) programme headed by Dr Wouter Basson, a programme which Apartheid racists used as a cover to kill black people in South Africa and beyond or do them serious harm. The racists’ ‘operational area’ was what used to be called the ‘Frontline States’ (now known simply as the SADC region). We covered Dr Basson’s operations in detail in our 2001 November Edition. South Africa’s CBW programme also had links with Rhodesia’s, and the pair did a lot of harm to black Africans, including spreading cholera and other dangerous diseases in the region, and topping it up with HIV/Aids experimentation. Worse, when independence was approaching in Zimbabwe, there are suggestions that Ian Smith’s Rhodesian government, with tacit support from South Africa, rushed to remove the evidence by killing a lot of black people who were subjects of the CBW experiments. Digging out the truth Cold Case Hammarskjöld MOVIE was made by Mads Brügger (Danish) and Göran Björkdahl (Swedish). The documentary investigates the case of the former UN secretary-general, Dag Hammarskjöld, who died in a mysterious plane crash near Ndola, Zambia, in 1961. We were at war. Black people in South Africa were the enemy… During the hearings of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission in 1998, letters with SAIMR’s official letterhead were found suggesting that the CIA and British intelligence had agreed that “Hammarskjöld should be removed”. But London and Washington denied involvement in Hammarskjöld’s assassination. In the course of making the new film, Brügger and Björkdahl’s investigations led them to Alexander Jones, who told them on camera that SAIMR (which had operated with the support of the CIA and British intelligence), used bogus vaccinations to spread the HIV virus in the SADC region. “We were at war. Black people in South Africa were the enemy,” Jones told the filmmakers. SADC Region of South Africa Where AIDS was spread by Poisoned Vaccines He confessed that he and his SAIMR colleagues “spread the virus” in the 1980s and 90s under the command of their leader Keith Maxwell, who wanted a white majority country, saying “the excesses of the 1960s, 70s and 80s have no place in the post-Aids world ”. “What easier way to get a guinea pig than you live in an Apartheid system?” Jones says in the film. “Black people have got no rights, they need medical treatment. There is a white ‘philanthropist’ coming in and saying, ‘You know, I will open up these clinics and I will treat you.’ And meantime [he is] actually the wolf in sheep’s clothing.” Maxwell died in 2006. People who knew him say he had no medical qualifications but operated clinics in the poor black neighbourhoods of Johannesburg. His headquarters was at Putfontein where his signpost, with his name ‘Dokotela Maxwell’, still hangs in front of the building where he operated. One local shopkeeper said Maxwell had given “false injections”. But Claude Newbury, an anti-abortion doctor, told the filmmakers: “He was against genocide and he was trying to discover a cure for HIV.” Jones, however, insists that Maxwell used the cover of a doctor to do “sinister experimentation”. His claim was backed up by Ibrahim Karolia, whose shop was across the road from where Maxwell operated. He told the filmmakers that Maxwell had provided “false injections” and “strange treatments”, and also put patients through “tubes” which he said allowed him to see inside their bodies. Jones also disclosed that SAIMR operated outside South Africa. “We were involved in Mozambique, spreading the Aids virus through medical conditions,” he says in the film, revealing that he did visit a research facility in the 1990s that was used “for sinister experimentation” and that the intent was “to eradicate black people”. “What easier way to get a guinea pig than you live in an Apartheid system?” Jones says in the film. “Black people have got no rights, they need medical treatment. There is a white ‘philanthropist’ coming in and saying, ‘You know, I will open up these clinics and I will treat you.’ And meantime [he is] actually the wolf in sheep’s clothing.” South Africa’s Josef Mengele Documents discovered by Brügger and Björkdahl show Maxwell held extremely disturbing views. “[South Africa] may well have one man, one vote with a white majority by the year 2000,” Maxwell wrote. “Religion in its conservative, traditional form will return. Abortion on demand, abuse of drugs, and the other excesses of the 1960s, 70s and 80s will have no place in the post-Aids world,” he added. According to the Observer South Africa, which broke the story, “The [Maxwell] documents read like the fever dream of a man who aspired to be South Africa’s Josef Mengele. [Joseph ‘Angel of Death’ Mengele was the senior SS officer who carried out inhuman experiments on Jewish prisoners at Auschwitz during World War II – Ed.] There are detailed, if sometimes garbled, accounts of how he thought the HIV virus could be isolated, propagated and used to target black Africans.” One SAIMR recruit, Dagmar Feil, a marine biologist, was murdered outside her home in Johannesburg in 1990 for fear she would expose SAIMR’s dark deeds. We all know how Aids is transmitted from person to person; there is no confusion there. The question is whether or not another agency played an active part in starting or accelerating the chain-reaction in some places. Jones says it did and that the agency was the dreaded SAIMR. Her brother, Karl Feil, told Brügger and Björkdahl: “My sister came to me and said she needed to confide in me. She sat with me and said she thought they were going to kill her. She said that three or four others in her team had already been murdered, but when I asked what team, she said she couldn’t tell me. “The topic of Aids research came up several times, quite loosely in conversations, I never put two and two together. Instead, she asked me to go with her to church, so she could make right with God. Weeks later she was dead.” But while the revelations in the documentary have stunned the world, the blowback has already started. The New York Times has dismissed Alexander Jones’ revelations as a “conspiracy theory”. Reporting his story on 27 January, the paper asked the question: “But is this true?” “The notion that HIV is a man-made virus introduced as population control has been floating around for decades,” The New York Times says. “Before the conspiracy theory took hold in Africa, it appeared as part of disinformation campaigns from the Soviet Union during the Cold War.” So now it is the fault of the Soviet Union! But it is the usual trick the Western establishment media employs to defend Western interests. “Scientists immediately cast doubt on [ Jones’] claim, which they called medically dubious. ‘The probability that they were able to do this is close to zero,’” The New York Times goes on to say, quoting Dr Salim Abdool Karim, the director of Caprisa, an AIDS research centre in South Africa. The paper says Dr Karim cited “the immense resources that would be required to conduct such a far-fetched attempt at genocide. Notwithstanding the technological limitations of the 1990s, including [the need for] facilities to rival that of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the US, in addition to millions of dollars in funding, HIV is extraordinarily difficult to isolate, transport and grow in a laboratory environment, let alone distribute en masse in a clandestine operation,” Dr Karim was said to have explained. Yet, apart from wheeling out just one African (Dr Karim) to dismiss Jones’ account, The New York Times named no more scientists in its story to justify the assertion that “scientists immediately cast doubt on the claim”, apart from quoting Rebecca Hodes, director of the AIDS and Society Research Unit at the University of Cape Town, as having said: “Such mistruths can cause very real problems. One dangerous consequence of these allegations is that they have the potential to sow mistrust and suspicion of doctors and the medical establishment, and that they may confuse people about how HIV is transmitted.” The truth will out Not so. We all know how Aids is transmitted from person to person; there is no confusion there. The question is whether or not another agency played an active part in starting or accelerating the chain-reaction in some places. Jones says it did and that the agency was the dreaded SAIMR. He also spells out the motivation behind it – “to eradicate black people” – so that the whites could continue their dominance in South Africa. “We were at war”, he adds, implying that all is fair in love and war. This has nothing to do with the often excellent work that doctors and the medical establishment, faced with HIV/ Aids, did to stem the tide of the disease. They were, and are still in some cases, firefighting and deserve all the credit they get. The question remains, who started the fire in the first place? Jones’ confession is a bombshell. It confirms what many suspected at the time but were unable or indisposed to pursue further. It also helps explain many inconsistencies in the story of the development of Aids in Southern Africa. But this is clearly just the tip of the iceberg – underneath lurks perhaps one of the most terrifying stories of modern times, how the Apartheid regime deliberately set out to commit genocide and how close it came to achieving its ends. The confession might bring a sense of closure for some of the millions of Aids victims and their families or it may spark fresh anger. Of equal significance, it will finally lay to rest the oft-cited trope that Africans brought the curse of Aids on themselves due to their ‘unbridled sexuality’. Why did Jones confess after such a long time? We cannot know for sure but there is such a thing as living with a guilty conscience and it will not be the first time that someone approaching the end of their lives feels compelled to confess to sins in order to lift the heavy burden they have carried on their souls for so long. The truth, as they say, will out – no matter how long it takes to do so. NA Read more articles by Baffour Ankomah Keywords: ColonialismForeign InterferenceHealthMarch 2019South AfricaSouthern Africa Written By Baffour Ankomah Baffour Ankomah is New African’s current Editor at Large. He has spent much of his 39 years of journalism at the magazine, having served as its Assistant Editor for 6 years, Deputy Editor for 5 years, and Editor for 15 years, retiring from active service in 2014. In 39 years of his journalism career – Africa and his many causes have been his passion. His personal column, Baffour’s Beefs, which has been running continuously in New African since 1987, is a big hit and a must-read for the magazine’s worldwide readers. He is now based in Zimbabwe, where he and his wife Elizabeth run their own media consultancy and fashion house called “African Interest” which trades under the trademark “I am African”. This expose’ helps to explain the 336 Biolabs America maintains around the world, the 46 in Ukraine and the epidemics like covid, MERS, avian influenza and EBola among others. I think Dag H was murdered because he found out about the AIDS plot and because he pissed off huge colonial economic interests in want Africa primarily for Africans.

For more see by bibliography. https://jormajyrkkanen.wordpress.com/2023/01/13/jorma-antero-jyrkkanens-bibliography-2022/