March 9, 2008 / by quarksandgenes
WOMAN MADE OF MAN'S RIB; HER XY->XX CHROMOSOME PROBLEM
If the traditional theological male God of the Monotheists made woman from a man's rib, He included one X chromosome and undoubtedly made a duplicate because as we know, women have two of them. He must have made a duplication and insertion. As an afterthought, I have to ask what He did with the rib's Y chromosomes that would have been present in every cell. Clearly He made a deletion. He was designing them then they must be Perfect because the products are in His Perfect image and He alone made them. Did He not then say; "IT IS GOOD!"
It is here that as a critical analyst and scientist, that I must interject, that there are issues arising from mutations on the X chromosome which speaks to notions of perfection, goodness, design and purpose which calls into question this particular traditional notion of the origin of women.
G: RATHER PORK RIB GENES THAN YOURS. J: Fool, that is still 90% human!
One must ask what possible purpose all the genetic diseases He included with those chromosomes could have served? Why for example and for what purpose would he include multiple mental retardation genes on the X chromosome? What horrible thing does this say about that particular God's Perfection or the purpose of His design? Go to the human genome project and check out this site and you will be shocked:
http://www.gdb.org/gdbreports/Chr.X.omim.html
Ask only if this design has purpose and ask only what possible purpose that might be and you will be steered completely in another direction. There is clearly no Designer of Perfection. There are mutations and natural selection acting to limit and control harmful mutations or choose beneficial ones for inclusion in the genome. Natural selection acting on mutations is the designer and evolution is the result, imperfect at best but as good as one could expect under the circumstances. Evolution is the creator and it alone is god if you choose such nomenclature, a process like Kraft Cheese is a process but a tad more complicated.
If one chooses for democratic, ignorance or bigotry reasons to disregard the forensic DNA evidence at the genome site and 150 years of evolutionary biology along with its profound philosophical ramifications and prefers to stick with the ancient traditional theological male God of the Monotheists as the maker of woman, then one is inclined to conclude that as a Geneticist He was capable of magic with duplications, deletions and insertions but with regard to mutations, He was far from the expected 'Perfect' at design and reluctantly I conclude, either completely incompetent or outright malicious. The duplicitousness and dispersion of retardation genes argues for the latter. Jormawankenobe argues on the evidence that "IT IS NOT GOOD!" How can this be if a Perfect Being made her in his Perfect Image? The carpet of my early indoctrinated truth has been yanked violently by fact from under my ignorant trusting feet! I am led inexorably to conclude that god did not make woman from Man's rib and from the weight of evidence, that god does not exist except as a protoscientific fabrication of mythologists gone wild.
In the long running aftermath of the Scopes Trial there has been nearly a century of denial, debate and controversy stirred by nauseous repetitious 'Reductio ad Absurdum' and evidence has often been simply ignored or refuted by being dragged 'Out of Context' by ecclesiastical Naysayer Deniars. Rhetorical logic has been argued as the scientific truth. But now, in these above five short paragraphs with the marvelous forensics of the human Genome for which elucidation we must eternally thank Celeron and Vinter and NIH and others who found the various diseases, Darwin has finally won. The same forensics are accepted evidence in all courts of law.
Religion has utterly, completely and finally failed the scrutiny of a scientist and been vanquished at its roots. Darwin's Bishop and Darwin's evolutionary biology student and Pawn, Jormawankenobe has checkmated the White King and scored a final victory for Evolution. Q.E.D. But it leaves a paradoxical conundrum, for there is a creation; universe and life, a creator; physical and organic evolution, and you can call it god if you wish and you can understand that creator by studying science; creation science! I myself am passionate about science but draw the line at worship. I do however, like Jesus, believe in love as the greatest power.
DARWIN BITES BACK; SCOPES KILLED BY GENOME FORENSICS
I urge the reader to study these findings carefully for the survival of human life on earth may well depend upon their implications.
© 2008 J. Jyrkkanen
No comments:
Post a Comment