My Literature Review found that EMF causes brain cancer 1and leukemia in kids 1990. New Study EMF causes Brain Cancer 2009. Jorma Jyrkkanen

My study EMF and brain cancer 1990 New Study EMF causes Brain Cancer 2009 March 17, 2009 jjyrkkanen76@outlook.com 2009 EMF Study Brain Cancer in Kids My Study Same Result 1990 See https://jorma-jyrkkanen.blogspot.com/search?q=EMF Added : Tuesday, March 17th 2009 by quarksandgenes Related Tags : health, news, technology, cancer, children I released an almost identical result 19 years ago. Brain Cancer in Kids. What is taking so long for action to take place? 17 March 2009 Children who use cellphones are five times more likely to develop malignant brain tumors. Headline in The Province Newspaper Tuesday March 17 2009. Here is my comprehensive review of the subject which I published in 1990 where I conclude that brain cancer and leukemia are increased by exposure to EMF. Kids have been dying from these diseases for 19 years because nobody acted on my overview assessment when I made it public. I am furious at the establishment, at the utility companies, and at the health services of the developed world. We have been killing kids for no good reason whatsoever. http://www.geocities.com/jormabio/archive/emfcarcinogenicity.html My EMF Study Conclusion, 1990 This EMF Cancer review is based on literature references obtained from Bonneville Power, Battelle and BC Hydro, spanning 1979-1989 and from a computor search of DIALOG databases for 1989-90. I have since become aware that DIALOG has had a legal battle with CAS, Chemical Abstracts Society, and this may have led to less reporting of actual published research than that which I obtained at least for my 1989-90 computor online update, so there may be gaps. How the librarian chose which studies I would receive from the total list I asked for is not clear so a source of bias could have been enterred there. It has also been argued that findings which show no effects are less likely to get published. I seriously question this however, since it is in the vested interests of utilities to make widely known any such null effects, and they would promote the publication of such studies. If anything, perhaps the reverse is true. Perhapsthesetwotendencies cancel out and a truly representative pattern of negative and positive findings is in fact published. There is a massive problem with controls in the majority of these studies since EMF is so wide-spread, it is almost impossible to get an unexposed group. The best that can be hoped for is a less exposed group. However, even this runs into trouble interpretation-wise when one considers that specific windows of frequency and intensity and combinations may be more important in causality than simple density of electric or magnetic fields. The effect of using national averages as controls where even the controls have been exposed to EMF to some degree, is to underestimate the true effect of EMF so that5 it is safe to say that it is worse than experimentally demonstrated. RESULTS The conclusions one is drawn to from an overview such as this are inescapable. EMF or something to do with EMF makes leukemia worse if not actually causing it or some forms of it, though the evidence points strongly towards causality. Brain cancer is made worse or actually caused by EMF or an associated factor. Other cancers are probably made worse or promoted by EMF exposure. Fundamental genetic and perhaps epigenetic cellular physiology changes occur, some permanently, from certain tunings or windows of EMF. Effects on development can be profound and species variability in susceptability to EMF impacts is largely unknown. Confounding variables like chemical pollutants, solvent vapors, metals, may be operative synergistically as initiators, promoters, physiological poisons, hormone analogs, or cocarcinogens ormayworkthrough harming the immune system. CONCLUSION It is safe to conclude from a reading of the totality of studies relating EMF to cancer, to which I have accessed so far, that EMF is a highly probable cancer hazard contributing worldwide to significantly increased human and non-human morbidity and mortality. While it may be more statistically formal to do a Meta-Analysis on the studies (Mann, C. 1990. Meta-Analysis in the Breech. Science (249):476-480.), the trends are so strong that I doubt that any significant change in the final interpretation would result. This conclusion isn’t likely to be reversed by even a few well done studies showing the opposite because of the massive weight of evidence showing an effect. I therefore conclude that a policy of prudent avoidance of exposure and protection of organisms from unwitting exposure to EMF, coupled to improved measures to avoid those potential synergistic substances, is wise at this time. From my review, it is clear that there are potential medical benefits to continued research in this area however as regards cancer treatment and prevention and other diseases and conditions, and I urge funding sources to donate generously to such endeavors. I wish to thank Dr. Robert Dykes, MD for financial assistance in securing the computer search and DIALOG bibliography, Kathy Ruggles of the College of New Caledonia for her untiring support and research efforts, and BC Hydro for providing the Battelle, Bonneville and Hydro bibliographies. © 1990, Jorma Jyrkkanen. All Rights Reserved. Contact jormabio@hotmail.com Jormawankenobe Copyright 2009 J. Jyrkkanen. All rights reserved.