Monday, January 30, 2023
Biden-US Govt DOD Funded ECOHEALTH In Wuhan and 46 others in Ukraine 2023-01-30, Jorma Antero Jyrkkanen BSc, PDP
DARPA Developed the Covid Bioweapon. So Who is DARPA.
Truth Justice ™@SpartaJustice BREAKING NEWS: The FDA was involved in the development of Covid-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon at UNCBSL3. The Pentagon bought and paid for the toxic mRNA shots and helped create Covid-19. All are guilty of Nuremberg crimes, murder and conspiracy to commit murder.
The CDC Director Rochelle Walensky is also accountable for these murders and Nuremberg crimes. The Harvard Medical School was also involved in the development of Covid-19 at the UNCBSL3 lab with Ralph Baric along with the FDA.
The CDC has long been involved in offensive biological weapons dating back to the Reagan Administration. The Reagan Administration authorized the CDC to ship biological warfare agents to Saddam Hussein in Iraq hoping he would use them against Iran.
U.S. International Lawyer Professor Francis Boyle states the end goal of DARPA, the Pentagon, the FDA, the CDC, the CIA, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak, Anthony Fauci, the Rockefellers, Rothschilds and many others is population control and reduction while making billions of dollars. New reports show worldwide excess deaths of 12 million innocent people.
Professor Boyle drafted the U.S. domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, that was approved unanimously by both Houses of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush.
Professor Boyle has also advised numerous international bodies in the areas of human rights, war crimes and genocide, nuclear policy, and bio-warfare. From 1991-92, he served as Legal Advisor to the Palestinian Delegation to the Middle East Peace Negotiations.
He goes on to say that the population control and reduction objective goes back to the National Security directive by the Henry Kissinger Report written in 1974 which stated that it was in the best interest of National Security for the United States and for Overseas Interests to have a population control and reduction policy.
The National Security Study Memorandum NSSM200 Implications of Worldwide Population Growth For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (THE KISSINGER REPORT) dated December 10, 1974 was Classified and Confidential until it was Declassified on 7/3/89. Read the entire report to understand what they are doing.
All citizens of the world are strongly encouraged to go to their local Sheriff's Office, Police Office and District or State Attorney General's Office and file criminal charges of murder and conspiracy to commit murder, demanding that the people responsible be arrested and prosecuted. This must be done, be brave and act now humanity.
The Chinese Communist Government also helped the Pentagon and the FDA create Covid-19. They new they were developing a dangerous offensive biological warfare weapon with gain of function properties that had HIV DNA genetically engineered into it and was combined with nanotechnology in order to aerosolize it enabling the bioweapon to travel up to 30 feet in the air.
They deliberately created both biological warfare weapons Covid-19 and the lethal Covid vaccines long before the Pandemic and then they created a fraudulent Pandemic in order to release these deadly biological weapons of war on humanity to kill millions of innocent people worldwide.
39.1K views
0:03 / 17:16
11:37 AM · Apr 14, 2023
·
125.2K
Views
The rest of the story
Biden-US Govt DOD Funded ECOHEALTH In Wuhan and 46 others in Ukraine 2023-01-30, Jorma Antero Jyrkkanen BSc, PDP
What we know.
1. Five days ago, 25 January, Senator Joni Ernst called for US Government to Quit Funding ECOHEALTH WHICH IS RUN BY CEO Dr. Peter Daszak.
https://www.ernst.senate.gov/news/press-releases/ernst-says-defund-ecohealth-alliance-after-investigation-reveals-their-mismanagement-of-covid-experiments-in-wuhan-china
The Iowa senator introduced legislation to permanently defund EcoHealth Alliance.
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) is calling on Congress to put an immediate and permanent end to taxpayer funding of EcoHealth Alliance following the release of an investigation today that found the organization mismanaged coronavirus experiments in Wuhan, China.
Senator Ernst requested the investigation by the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) upon learning that EcoHealth was spending tax dollars on dangerous coronaviruses in Communist China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and was not disclosing information about those projects to the public, as required by law.
The investigation found EcoHealth, WIV, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were all at fault for mismanagement:
EcoHealth did not immediately notify NIH when a coronavirus was enhanced to become more lethal, as required; and, when it did, NIH did not quickly act to have the pathogen reviewed for pandemic potential.
EcoHealth misspent tens of thousands of tax dollars on bonuses, junkets, and other unallowable costs.
China’s WIV did not cooperate.
The OIG suggests that WIV should be permanently barred from receiving U.S. taxpayer dollars, EcoHealth should return misspent taxpayer money, and NIH should increase oversight of EcoHealth and other projects involving pathogens with pandemic potential.
Ernst’s response to the HHS investigation:
“While NIH certainly shares in the blame, EcoHealth Alliance is ultimately at fault for failing to tell the world what was really going on at China’s Wuhan Institute. They are guilty of either complacency or a cover-up, or maybe a little of both,” said Ernst.“EcoHealth was paid millions, promising their hunt for bat viruses would protect the world from a pandemic…well, the world got a pandemic, and EcoHealth keeps getting millions. We can’t afford any more of EcoHealth’s ‘prevention’ efforts. That’s why we mustpermanently ban them from receiving taxpayer dollars ever again.”
Since the world learned of the COVID-19 pandemic at the beginning of 2020 – including the role EcoHealth might have played in a potential lab leak— EcoHealth has been given more than $40 million in taxpayer dollars. Just last month, the Biden administration awarded the group $3 million out of the Department of Defense (DOD) budget.
Ernst’s response to the administration’s latest check to EcoHealth:
“The Biden administration is funding EcoHealth to search for risky viruses in places all across the globe, except where they might actually find them: in their own lab experiments! Washington is looking for ways to trim spending, so let’s start by cutting the millions of dollars flowing to EcoHealth’s batty experiments,” said Ernst.
2. Yesterday Russia claimed Labs in Ukraine created the covid problem.
3. Zelensky Ordered Destruction of All State Docs Associated with METABIOTA on 02/24/22. WAS METABIOTA DOING ILLEGAL STUFF regarding covid in Ukraine and why would Selensky order Dept of Defense Records on METABIOTA destroyed??
4. METABIOTA REGISTERED IN CALIFORNIA AND OPERATING IN UKRAINE AND HUNTER BIDEN ASSOCIATION
Association with EcoHealth Alliance of Wuhan Projects Indicates Collaboration Potential.
5. USA ADMITS RUNNING 46 LABS IN UKRAINE JUNE 14 2022. TO WHAT PURPOSE???
https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/after-months-of-denial-u-s-admits-to-running-ukraine-biolabs/
6. BUILT WUHAN LAB UNDER CULTURAL EXCHANGE PROGRAM AND FAILED TO DECLARE INCOME. BUSTED Dr. Charles Lieder
Legal Ramifications of Conducting Secret Research on biowarfare capable pathogens stem from an International Convention on Pathogensx for the purpose of military use. The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), or Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), is a disarmament treaty that effectively bans biological and toxin weapons by prohibiting their development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling and use.
The Convention Articles
Biological Weapons Convention
Preamble
Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction
The States Parties to this Convention,
Determined to act with a view to achieving effective progress towards general and complete disarmament, including the prohibition and elimination of all types of weapons of mass destruction, and convinced that the prohibition of the development, production and stockpiling of chemical and bacteriological (biological) weapons and their elimination, through effective measures, will facilitate the achievement of general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control,
Recognising the important significance of the Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925, and conscious also of the contribution which the said Protocol has already made and continues to make, to mitigating the horrors of war,
Reaffirming their adherence to the principles and objectives of that Protocol and calling upon all States to comply strictly with them,
Recalling that the General Assembly of the United Nations has repeatedly condemned all actions contrary to the principles and objectives of the Geneva Protocol of 17 June 1925,
Desiring to contribute to the strengthening of confidence between peoples and the general improvement of the international atmosphere,
Desiring also to contribute to the realisation of the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations,
Convinced of the importance and urgency of eliminating from the arsenals of States, through effective measures, such dangerous weapons of mass destruction as those using chemical or bacteriological (biological) agents,
Recognising that an agreement on the prohibition of bacteriological (biological) and toxin weapons represents a first possible step towards the achievement of agreement on effective measures also for the prohibition of the development, production and stockpiling of chemical weapons, and determined to continue negotiations to that end,
Determined, for the sake of all mankind, to exclude completely the possibility of bacteriological (biological) agents and toxins being used as weapons,
Convinced that such use would be repugnant to the conscience of mankind and that no effort should be spared to minimise this risk,
Have agreed as follows:
Article I
Each State Party to this Convention undertakes never in any circumstances to develop, produce, stockpile or otherwise acquire or retain:
(1) microbial or other biological agents, or toxins whatever their origin or method of production, of types and in quantities that have no justification for prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes;
(2) weapons, equipment or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict.
Article II
Each State Party to this Convention undertakes to destroy, or to divert to peaceful purposes, as soon as possible but not later than nine months after the entry into force of the Convention, all agents, toxins, weapons, equipment and means of delivery specified in Article I of the Convention, which are in its possession or under its jurisdiction or control. In implementing the provisions of this Article all necessary safety precautions shall be observed to protect populations and the environment.
Article III
Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to transfer to any recipient whatsoever, directly or indirectly, and not in any way to assist, encourage, or induce any State, group of States or international organisations to manufacture or otherwise acquire any of the agents, toxins, weapons, equipment or means of delivery specified in Article I of the Convention.
Article IV
Each State Party to this Convention shall, in accordance with its constitutional processes, take any necessary measures to prohibit and prevent the development, production, stockpiling, acquisition or retention of the agents, toxins, weapons, equipment and means of delivery specified in Article I of the Convention, within the territory of such State, under its jurisdiction or under its control anywhere.
Article V
The States Parties to this Convention undertake to consult one another and to co-operate in solving any problems which may arise in relation to the objective of, or in the application of the provisions of, the Convention. Consultation and co-operation pursuant to this Article may also be undertaken through appropriate international procedures within the framework of the United Nations and in accordance with its Charter.
Article VI
(1) Any State Party to this Convention which finds that any other State Party is acting in breach of obligations deriving from the provisions of the Convention may lodge a complaint with the Security Council of the United Nations. Such a complaint should include all possible evidence confirming its validity, as well as a request for its consideration by the Security Council.
(2) Each State Party to this Convention undertakes to co-operate in carrying out any investigation which the Security Council may initiate, in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, on the basis of the complaint received by the Council. The Security Council shall inform the States Parties to the Convention of the results of the investigation.
Article VII
Each State Party to this Convention undertakes to provide or support assistance, in accordance with the United Nations Charter, to any Party to the Convention which so requests, if the Security Council decides that such Party has been exposed to danger as a result of violation of the Convention.
Article VIII
Nothing in this Convention shall be interpreted as in any way limiting or detracting from the obligations assumed by any State under the Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925.
Article IX
Each State Party to this Convention affirms the recognised objective of effective prohibition of chemical weapons and, to this end, undertakes to continue negotiations in good faith with a view to reaching early agreement on effective measures for the prohibition of their development, production and stockpiling and for their destruction, and on appropriate measures concerning equipment and means of delivery specifically designed for the production or use of chemical agents for weapons purposes.
Article X
(1) The States Parties to this Convention undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the use of bacteriological (biological) agents and toxins for peaceful purposes. Parties to the Convention in a position to do so shall also co-operate in contributing individually or together with other States or international organisations to the further development and application of scientific discoveries in the field of bacteriology (biology) for the prevention of disease, or for other peaceful purposes.
(2) This Convention shall be implemented in a manner designed to avoid hampering the economic or technological development of States Parties to the Convention or international co-operation in the field of peaceful bacteriological (biological) activities, including the international exchange of bacteriological (biological) agents and toxins and equipment for the processing, use or production of bacteriological (biological) agents and toxins for peaceful purposes in accordance with the provisions of the Convention.
Article XI
Any State Party may propose amendments to this Convention. Amendments shall enter into force for each State Party accepting the amendments upon their acceptance by a majority of the States Parties to the Convention and thereafter for each remaining State Party on the date of acceptance by it.
Article XII
Five years after the entry into force of this Convention, or earlier if it is requested by a majority of Parties to the Convention by submitting a proposal to this effect to the Depositary Governments, a conference of States Parties to the Convention shall be held at Geneva, Switzerland, to review the operation of the Convention, with a view to assuring that the purposes of the preamble and the provisions of the Convention, including the provisions concerning negotiations on chemical weapons, are being realised. Such review shall take into account any new scientific and technological developments relevant to the Convention.
Article XIII
(1) This Convention shall be of unlimited duration.
(2) Each State Party to this Convention shall in exercising its national sovereignty have the right to withdraw from the Convention if it decides that extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of the Convention, have jeopardised the supreme interests of its country. It shall give notice of such withdrawal to all other States Parties to the Convention and to the United Nations Security Council three months in advance. Such notice shall include a statement of the extraordinary events it regards as having jeopardised its supreme interests.
Article XIV
(1) This Convention shall be open to all States for signature. Any State which does not sign the Convention before its entry into force in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article may accede to it at any time.
(2) This Convention shall be subject to ratification by signatory States. Instruments of ratification and instruments of accession shall be deposited with the Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the United States of America, which are hereby designated the Depositary Governments.
(3) This Convention shall enter into force after the deposit of instruments of ratification by twenty-two Governments, including the Governments designated as Depositaries of the Convention.
(4) For States whose instruments of ratification or accession are deposited subsequent to the entry into force of this Convention, it shall enter into force on the date of the deposit of their instruments of ratification or accession.
(5) The Depositary Governments shall promptly inform all signatory and acceding States of the date of each signature, the date of deposit of each instrument of ratification or of accession and the date of the entry into force of this Convention, and of the receipt of other notices.
(6) This Convention shall be registered by the Depositary Governments pursuant to Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations.
Article XV
This Convention, the English, Russian, French, Spanish and Chinese texts of which are equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the Depositary Governments. Duly certified copies of the Convention shall be transmitted by the Depositary Governments to the Governments of the signatory and acceding States.
Edits. This page was last edited on 15 February 2021, at 20:26.
THE AFOREMENTIONED DOCUMENTS HAVE STRONG CLUES THAT THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND BIDENS IN PARTICULAR MAY HAVE VIOLATED THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL WEAONS BY COVERT FUNDING OF PATHOGENS CAPABLE OF CAUSING A PANDEMIC AAND SHOULD BE REFERRED TO INTERPOL AND THE ICC AND UN SECRETARIAT ON BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS FOR INVESTIGATION.
Just in case you missed the Laptop Revelations. They speak to the integrity of the Bidens.
WERE THESE TWO, FAUCI AND GATES INVOLVED IN THE ORIGIN OF THE MOST RECENT PANDEMIC?
FAUCI ABOUT FACE GAIN OF FUNCTION A MISTAKE BECAUSE THERE IS NO DURABLE FIX FOUND YET
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
DARWINIAN EVOLUTIONS CONCLUSION CREATOR IS QUANTUM FIELD DISTURBANCE DYNAMICS ANOMALIES MODIFIED BY SERENDIPITY, PHYSICAL AND ORGANIC EVOLUTION 2025-04-10
We Are the Universe Become Sentient Pondering Itself Courtesy of Disturbance Dynamics in Quantum Fields. We are the Mind of the Universe i...
-
Environment Gene Interactions Just another WordPress.com weblog « Chimp Origin of AIDS in Koprowski’s Live Polio Vaccinations of Leopoldvil...
-
Biden-US Govt DOD Funded ECOHEALTH In Wuhan and 46 others in Ukraine 2023-01-30 in possible contravention of the UN Convention Prohibiting ...
-
FAUCI AND GATES FUNDED GAIN OF FUNCTION ON H5N1 Technical Report: Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Viruses Español | Other Language...
No comments:
Post a Comment